While the iPad is not an immediate must buy for me, I still find it compelling and can envision owning one. I’ve been thinking about having some kind of electronic book reader for a while. I like the Amazon app on the iPhone, but it would be nice if it were, well, bigger. So just from an e-book reader point of view, the iPad makes more sense than the Kindle DX (the most analogous competitor in terms of size). It is the same way that it made more sense to buy a PS3 than a dedicated Bluray player. The PS3 plays your Bluray discs. Oh, and it also plays hundreds of video games. So for $10 more you can get a color, multi-touch e-book reader that also does thousands of other things. And since the Kindle app works on the iPad, the iPad for all intents and purposes *is* a Kindle.
The total cost of ownership for a book is definitely higher on the iPad, though. The same $10 book on the Kindle is going to cost you $25 on the iPad when you factor in the minimum $15/month data plan. Of course, you could amortize the charge over, say, 10 books and then you’re down to $11.50 TCO per book, which isn’t bad.
The size of the thing really does matter. There’s lots of applications on the iPhone that I wish were bigger and easier to interact with, but not so large that I would need a full sized computer to use. Playing virtual board games seems like a real possibility now. How cool would an iPad port of Carcassonne be? And how cool would the inevitable comic book reader be? I’m intrigued by the iPad’s potential to be the platform for Harry Potter-esque newspapers with interactive content. Web sites do that now, yes, but there’s something cool about holding it in your hand.
I was sad to see there was no camera, so Dave and I’s musings of super easy telepresence will not become reality.